Eccentric Flower talk:200911/Things
From Eccentric Flower
Comments on Eccentric Flower:200911/Things
As a subscriber, don't you have access to the Economist on line? I don't have the time to read any of the articles, even when you posted links, but I'd be happy to read your precis and commentary, along with a pullquote of the nutgraf.
-- 18:46, 7 November 2009 (GMT)
Leave it to you to agree to a literally mechanical universe when its "proof" lies in a lego box. I'm still prepared to believe that everything is conserved in the universe, however rarified it might seem to be before conditions allow such phenomena to become perceivable among its blindest members, and how temporary such conditions might appear to be on the larger scale of things. I must assume that there are more Things that lie outside the current measurement means and conceptual framework of Science. Whether they become irrelevant to us in the short term by being thus unreachable by science is another matter.
-- 00:18, 8 November 2009 (GMT)
Robert: I don't subscribe. I pick it up every Monday at the newsstand.
Marc: That was almost in English.
-- 04:14, 8 November 2009 (GMT)
Bunny42:
Oh, yeah... I've dithered endlessly about checking that box on the form. I'm thinking maybe this time I'll do it.
-- 01:10, 7 November 2009 (GMT)