Eccentric Flower:201006/Back Away
From Eccentric Flower
Back Away
With the exception of the next entry, which I have now realized I have to get out of my system because it's been eating my brain for nearly twenty-four hours and I have work to do goddamn it, this journal may be about to go even more quiet than it has been for a while. I make no promises; I've done that before and they always get broken. I could say "hiatus" and then find seventeen things I urgently need to post about. It's happened. But right now, my overwhelming impulse is "back away slowly so no one gets hurt."
The fundamental problem is that you're all (and I don't just mean you personally, but the entire internet collectively) pissing me off. Every day.
Oh, I'm sure some of it is dangerous instability on my part, and will likely lead very soon now to my total breakdown followed by a killing spree ... nah, I'm kidding, but it's not good for my health to get so annoyed so easily all the time.
The internet is an emotional rollercoaster for me even on good days, and right now I'm not having good days when I'm on the internet. (I have plenty of good days - the days I am offline, outside, doing something fun.) It's bad enough when strangers or enemies say something on the 'net that pisses me off, but when my friends do, it's really miserable. I can either fire back and possibly alienate them for good, or I can bite my tongue and hope that I don't explode from the strain of suppressing it.
As I've said before, I don't have a problem with people replying to something I've written in the form, "I disagree with you and here's why." What I dislike is the form "You're wrong and here's why." This may not seem like much of a distinction to you, but it's very important to me, because I am emotionally fragile and without much of a support network. I like arguments, but I'm also brittle; a bad combination, and one which has not worked out well in recent months.
Especially of late, I have begun to get the feeling that many of you comment only to tell me that I'm wrong, read with full attention only when you think it will be one of my tearing rants, and then only so you can pick out the parts where you will delight in telling me that I'm wrong. I am coming to believe that I've become a running joke, "Oh, it's been a while, guess I'll go read Eccentric Flower and see what the rant of the week is, that's always good for a laugh."
(N.B. Don't bother posting to tell me I'm wrong about this. I may very well be wrong about this. That's not the point. I'm discussing my impressions, my sensations, my emotions, not facts. It doesn't matter a dime why you're really here - we are discussing how the back of my brain feels about the matter, and that is a fact-proof situation. You know, I don't like snakes. It doesn't matter if the snake is dangerous; you can't just say to me "That snake isn't dangerous, stop being scared of the snake," and have me instantly stop being scared of the snake. I probably already know the snake isn't dangerous; my reaction is happening on a far more visceral level.)
I also admit that my opinions keep diverging more and more from the state of How Things Really Are (and thus probably appear steadily more ludicrous to you). That's not because of ignorance (nor, I hasten to add, insanity), it's because of idealism. Every day, my idea of What Things Should Be becomes further and further separated from How Things Really Are - and it's not because my goalpost is moving - it's the one at the other end that keeps receding, as the state of the world sinks ever further into horrific conditions. There's only one news publication I trust anymore, and it's not usually a very cheerful one. Some weeks it's all I can do to get through that one lump of news, let alone seek out more of it.
I realize, realistically, that What Things Should Be is not ever going to happen, and gets less likely the worse real conditions get. But that doesn't prevent me from arguing What Things Should Be, from clinging to my ideals, even though they're bleeding to death. I have nothing else. Being willing to work within the state of How Things Really Are would imply that I admitted even the smallest shred of possibility that that state could be improved, which I no longer do. I don't think the world can be fixed - definitely not by someone powerless like me, and possibly not even by the most powerful people on earth. I think all I can personally do, all any of us down here among the rabble can do, is watch it spiral down the drain and try to be reasonably nice to one another while we wait for the end.
It's at times like this I can see why the mindset of the millennialists (AKA the Rapture crowd) is so attractive to them. Of course, their problem is that they all believe they're better than everyone else and so they're calmly waiting because they are all sure they will be blessed, and all the filth will be washed away. I don't believe I'm better than anyone else, and I can't stand people who do. Fuck you, millennialists.
My choices are very limited here. Living full-time in my fantasy world is not constructive. Contact with the real world is not doing my health any favors. Telling me to get a grip is like telling me to stop being scared of the snake. Telling me the world isn't as bad as I think it is will just lead me to believe you're not paying enough attention. Telling me to seek psychological help will just make me extremely angry with you, as to me 1) that means you think I sound crazy and 2) that means you want me to "correct" or "improve" my mindset, even though there is absolutely nothing wrong with it.
Right now being depressed/angry with the state of the world is the correct attitude. Any attempts to "improve" that attitude are like deliberately setting one's compass to a false north. Unfortunately it's not a very good attitude - I understand why people try to dodge it - but that doesn't change the fact that it's the right one.
The world can be a beautiful place. There are many beautiful days in my life. But those are, inevitably, the days that I put all this out of my mind and go off to enjoy myself and the world. The word for that is "avoidance" (my primary entertainment strategy)! I could make more days like that, but I'd always have to come back to the facts. Sooner or later I have to come back to the computer and look at the world (because the computer is the lens I see most of the world through), and then the black feeling in my stomach comes right back with a venegance.
The internet is my preferred social contact. I don't do well with people in person, or over the telephone, and anyway most of you I like the best are scattered all over the planet, and so difficult to see physically. What I would like to get, what I most value from the internet, are the glimpses into your lives, and the banter and conversation and daily byplay. I like having friends I can kid around with and exchange ideas with. I like getting things recommended to me from people who have known me long enough to have some idea of my tastes, and vice versa. I like trading bad jokes. I like hearing about your kids. (I love hearing about your kids, actually. It amuses me that some of you are worried you talk about your kids too much online.)
This is important, and it's even positive: Hearing about my friends' lives is the main thing that convinces me there is any value to be had in the world at all. Y'all are the good parts - the bright spots in a black morass of slime and tarnish and filth.
The problem is I don't have a good filter for just getting that kind of stuff. If I open the door wide enough to see how you are all doing, I will also inevitably get exposed to the assholes and the nit-pickers and the pointless fights and the egoboo and the petty posturing and all the other crap that composes most of the noise in the internet's (poor) signal/noise ratio.
If you know one, let me know. Meanwhile, I'm afraid that I'm going to have to shut out some of the good stuff more often than I'd like, just to avoid the bad stuff, because it's ruining way too many of my days right now.
And the side effect of that is, I've got to stop myself from giving opinions on anything even remotely controversial whenever possible (with the exception of the next entry), because I'm just too fragile right now to deal with the consequences when I do.
I'm a little embarrassed posting this entry; even though it's a matter of deadly seriousness to me, I know it will not seem like that to you, and I hate making myself an object of ridicule yet again. Fortunately, most of you will have concluded about two paragraphs in that it's about me and what I think of the world, and so will not actually have read it. I've determined that those are the ones people don't read. If I rant about some definite issue in the real world, such as the firing of a general, people read it so they can tell me I'm wrong, but if it's just me talking about the inside of my head again, I'm pretty sure everyone has been trained to skip it by now.
I posted pictures of Duff Beer this morning!
Seriously, I have to be very careful these days about what I am reading online and looking at in photos/video, because I get very angry, frustrated and depressed by things like giant unstoppable oil spills and selfish greed and so forth. Sometimes I can't read the comments on your entries because someone has irritated me so much (not you, usually). That doesn't mean I'm not aware of these things, that I don't try to help financially or otherwise, but that I need a LOT of distractions.
I tend not to write controversial things anymore because I don't want to waste energy on fights that seem to have no productive use.
-- 17:38, 29 June 2010 (BST)
As a former idealist, I spent many painful years struggling trying to reconcile how I was taught the world should be with how it actually was, trying to build logical structures to explain how the principles that were embedded in me as I grew up led to observable reality.
I wouldn't go back to those days of meaning and belief in right and wrong for anything, but I fought tooth and nail to try to hold on to them, and watching you go through those struggles is hard.
It's worse because there are people who aren't "smart" enough to try to reconcile those things, who do allow for big gaps and manage to blissfully stay with their notions of ethics and morals (and religion and what-have-you). Back when I was a believer, I envied them immensely.
And, yes, that nihilism can flow from existentialism is scary as hell; it's damned hard to let go of meaning because it means we have to make our own. That ain't always easy.
So, no, no ridicule here. That stuff hurts, hard. I've been there. Just a gentle observation that somewhere and somehow (with a little help, although I don't often talk about that bit publicly, I will if asked directly and privately) I found my way through the meaning to a existentialism that's been way more fulfilling.
-- 17:46, 29 June 2010 (BST)
Oh honey, you're so not alone. I know it may feel you're alone, but you're definitely not (tho not everyone may be broadcasting their presence to you). Lots of us are frustrated with the state of the world - the crap political bullshit, the torn up environment, Rush Limbaugh...and all of the other things that are easily awful enough to make me question that God is anything other than a device of man to get you to eat your peas and tithe to *somebody* on a regular basis.
If "ranting" or just doing a typed spew on your blog helps you cope, then keep doing it. Who the fuck cares what other people think about it? Oh sure, you can say that YOU do because you want to be loved (and who wouldn't want to be loved?) but the interwebs isn't exactly a place where you'll find consistent adoration.
I remember seeing on the Babycenter boards - where preggos were supposed to support each other - that women would just as quickly tear each other down as build each other up, mostly because there was a lot of that black/white millenial-style thinking w/r/t stuff that just seems so silly to fight over (like whether you breast or bottle feed, or whether you cloth or disposable diaper). Srsly, I think maybe it was a bad idea to put so many hormonal women together.
For whatever it's worth, remember that you always have a centrally air-conditioned place - with powerful wireless! - to escape to, if you just want to be around kids and noise and mess. ;-) We love you. And that's not just me being all lovey-dovey-we're-family...I just want to remind you that there are butterflies and dogs with their tongues hanging out the side of their mouths, and good beer, and kielbasa fresh off the grill, and double chocolate brownies and all kinds of other things that make the world happy.
And, when all else fails, let me know you need to run away and I'll make you a lasagna. That should help, right?
-- 17:57, 29 June 2010 (BST)
I confess, I don't read the puzzle posts nor the computer wizardry posts (either games or programming). Other than that, I've been reading the things you write for over ten years, and I will keep right on reading whenever you post. Looking forward to the next one.
-- 18:15, 29 June 2010 (BST)
I just don't understand why it's so difficult for some people to hear the difference between "I disagree" and "You're wrong." F'rinstance, when assessing somebody's hair style, I'll hear "Her hair looks awful," not "I THINK her hair looks awful." The former leaves no room for any other opinion. Period. It must be nice to be so secure in one's beliefs and opinions that no one else's assessment could possibly matter. Kinda puts a damper on any further discussion. So I tend to just walk away.
Okay, I tried to send you a Doonesbury cartoon and my transmission failed--said a field had been flagged as spam. Eh?
-- 20:22, 29 June 2010 (BST)
Mel:
Right now being depressed/angry with the state of the world is the correct attitude.
Unfortunately I agree with this completely.
-- 22:22, 29 June 2010 (BST)
I know that I value reading your opinions even when I disagree strongly, and I'm not sure whether I've always been good about expressing disagreement instead of contradiction. And the recent cocktail posts, while totally over my head, make me wish I had a well-stocked liquor cabinet. In a decade or two I want to put you in charge of my minor children's education in drinking properly.
Take all the break you need. Several years ago I made a promise to myself -- inconsistently kept, natch -- that I would stop reading journals or public opinion blogs authored by anyone I didn't have at least a brushing face-to-face acquaintance with. That's my filter, and it keeps up pretty well.
Astute readers with too much time on their hands might notice that you're one of the exceptions that slipped through.
-- 06:41, 30 June 2010 (BST)
Yeah, it occurred to me the other day that we'd never met face-to-face and we probably should!
-- 15:41, 30 June 2010 (BST)
Bunny: Some code I have never had time to dig for thinks that trying to include an image in one of these comments is spammy behavior. Since hotlinking images is almost always a bad idea anyway, I haven't cared much about defeating it. Can you put in a link instead?
-- 15:44, 30 June 2010 (BST)
That's the problem, it WAS a link. And my HTML code was correct. I dunno what went wrong. I'll try to find it from a different source and give it another shot. Maybe the fact that I ganked it second-hand from the newspaper source I read made it look like an ad or something.
Here, let's try <a/href="http://www.gocomics.com/doonesbury/2010/06/26/">this one.</a>
Now mind, this is sent in the spirit of gentle teasing, nothing more nefarious. I feel your pain, but see the writing on the wall. Our local rags are so poorly edited and biased, I've taken to only getting the Sunday edition, for the two major crossword puzzles.
-- 16:53, 30 June 2010 (BST)
Oh, and the comments under the strip were interesting. You are not alone. I personally had not thought about carrying the laptop to the john.
-- 16:56, 30 June 2010 (BST)
I know and read the non-cheerful publication you read, and more's the better for it. How about another one sort-of from England? I think you might enjoy New Scientist. Really, it's got sciency stuff and often quite funny stuff, and it cheers me up a lot since I got a subscription instead of picking it up on the newsstand (when I often forgot or missed it). Buy a copy and see if it pokes you the right way.
-- 21:30, 9 July 2010 (BST)

Thomas:
"Fortunately, most of you will have concluded about two paragraphs in that it's about me and what I think of the world, and so will not actually have read it. I've determined that those are the ones people don't read. If I rant about some definite issue in the real world, such as the firing of a general, people read it so they can tell me I'm wrong, but if it's just me talking about the inside of my head again, I'm pretty sure everyone has been trained to skip it by now."
Silly, this you talking about the inside of your head is exactly the thing I cannot get anywhere else. Of course I read it (also, I skim even the entries that sometimes are about topics that may be alien to me just in case a nugget of you talking about the inside of your head has been hidden among the data or opinion that may be of no interest to me).
I understand being embarrassed (as it is very uncomfortable not to live up to the expectations one has about oneself), but I believe it is safe to bet there will be no upcoming ridicule due to you for writing or feeling this.
-- 17:35, 29 June 2010 (BST)