Eccentric Flower:200911/Two Important Quotes

From Eccentric Flower

«November 2009 «Eccentric Flower

Two Important Quotes

We are very fortunate to have a few thousand strangers who are actually interested in our daily lives. As the number of people who visit this site grew, so did the pressure to produce something decent. More importantly, the pressure to write something inspired or interesting has started to feel enormous. Sometimes it's just hard to come up with something in the face of that pressure. Neither of us wants to write just for the sake of updating the blog.

Wood still has a real job and some concerns that things written on this site could hurt her career. So she doesn't write as much as the guy without a job who committed career suicide years ago.

- Jim Griffioen, brilliant writer and photographer-of-ruin, writing what would have been the death notice of mouth organ if I had been that good, and what is still in some ways the underlying conundrum of any website I'll ever make.

Weirdly, I haven't talked much on the Net in my own voice for years. My main voice on the Net for long long time was the NTK one, which is actually rather disengaged and aloof. Dave and I inherited a disdain for political drama by the time were doing NTK: on my side that came from the psychic damage of having to write Weekending and Spitting Image; on Dave's I think it came from him from having to listen to people talking about writing for Weekending and fucking Spitting Image all day. Also I believe Dave thinks politics is an obscure branch of Earth Primatology. (I remember him noting the day after the landslide election that brought Labour and Tony Blair to power that maybe we should have mentioned it once in that day's NTK).

Anyway, because I was such a firebrand, he'd allow me to write one or two "worthy" news items a week, and I'd grudgingly allow him to write 3,000 words on chocolate anytime he wanted. In the NTK divorce, I got to bother people about the Open Rights Group (join now! Fight Peter Mandelson and meet Ben "Bad Science" Goldacre!), and he got to run SnackSpot (Confirmed sighting: Brannigans Roast Beef and Mustard/ Blue Diamond Jalapeno Smokehouse Almonds). So I got a little more worthy after NTK.

When I joined EFF, and put childish things behind me, I ended up dropping that voice too, and becoming even more worthy if that were possible. Weirdly, that meant becoming far less personally outspoken. I was EFF's main domestic activist for a while, and in that position, you quickly realise that anything you say, even informally, stops being "Danny said blah" and becomes "The EFF's Danny O'Brien stated." It's like walking around online with a loudhailer stuck to your mouth; you end up just not saying anything for fear of suddenly having headlines explaining how you're worse than Karl Rove and Hitler combined.

- Danny O'Brien, intermittently brilliant human whom I gather is a mite difficult to be friends with sometimes, irascible and neurotic and given to occasional meltdowns of self-loathing - put that mirror away before I smack you - who has, to my mind, never been more dead wrong than he is in these paragraphs. When he put NTK behind him, his voice lost something, and when he set up with the EFF, he became utterly uninteresting to me. Of course this is only personal taste. I'm sure there are people who cheered when he dropped the snark. But the snark was more real - he didn't have to be a mouthpiece for anything.

That said, I understand the last bit completely. There is something about the megaphone that has a chilling effect. (Especially if it's for a holier-than-thou group like the EFF.) Under the circumstances, sometimes the temptation to clam up completely and just go away for a while is irresistable. What happened when I was briefly a sex writer was that it stopped being "X said" and started, just barely around the edges, being "X, noted sex writer, said -" and that disturbed the shit out of me.

Really I just want to be able to say what I want to say without it having any consequences or significance for anyone or anything else in the world. But, on the other hand, I am also an exhibitionist; I want to be seen, I want to be read, I want to be loved. Which brings us to the question: Why would anyone come to see or read something that had no consequence or significance for them whatsoever?


<< older | © 2009 columbina | newer >>




Bunny42:

If you write it well enough, I'll read it, even if it has no significance for me whatsoever. Your WoW posts are a case in point. I told Robert I'll be reading Tom Robbins oeuvre, because it's so beautiful to "listen" to his writing. I might not care so much about the subjects, but the "music" is breathtaking.

So, that's a reason. FWIW, I'm checking out the archives to see what I've missed. Ever since that conversation in the tea room (wish I could remember what it was called) I'm a believer.

-- 22:47, 24 November 2009 (GMT)


ProfRobert:

"Why would anyone come to see or read something that had no consequence or significance for them whatsoever?"

To be entertained. And remember, most folks' standard of "entertaining" is abysmally low; how else do you explain Dancing with the Stars, Amazing Race, Big Brother and all of reality TV?

-- 23:41, 24 November 2009 (GMT)


DanLyke:

I'm with you on Danny O'Brien. I hung on every NTK word, and though I keep seeing a few things that make me think I ought to support the EFF, every time I get ready to commit to a check they do something face-palm worthy. So I've tuned out everything EFF, which means I didn't even know where he was any more. Even though I exchanged email with him occasionally back in the day.

I also miss Mouthorgan, and wonder if you think you could keep up a nom de plume for such an endeavor, but understand if you can't.

-- 00:38, 25 November 2009 (GMT)


Corvi:

OT, but thank you for the link to Jim Griffioen - I've been reading it all morning long.

Detroit really doesn't have a thing to do with me, but I like his writing and his photos. Same with Boston, so maybe this is not so off topic after all.

-- 18:47, 25 November 2009 (GMT)

Comment:

<< older | © 2009 columbina | newer >>

Personal tools
eccentric flower
fiction