Eccentric Flower:200911/Not Bitter No

From Eccentric Flower

«November 2009 «Eccentric Flower

Not Bitter, No

There was an editorial the other day from the Globe's resident defender of right-wing lunacy, Jeff Jacoby, which called out the left, essentially, for a lack of civility.

Please, hold your laughter until after the pullquotes ....

When will it occur to supporters of same-sex marriage that they do their cause no good by characterizing those who disagree with them as haters, bigots, and ignorant homophobes? It may be emotionally satisfying to despise as moral cripples the majorities who oppose gay marriage. But after going 0 for 31 - after failing to make the case for same-sex marriage even in such liberal and largely gay-friendly states as California, Wisconsin, Oregon, and now Maine - isn't it time to stop caricaturing their opponents as the equivalent of Jim Crow-era segregationists? Wouldn't it make more sense to concede that thoughtful voters can have reasonable concerns about gay marriage, concerns that will not be allayed by describing those voters as contemptible troglodytes?

[...]

After 31 losses in 31 states, it's time for same-sex marriage activists to seriously consider a piece of advice Barney Frank offered a few years ago. "There's something to be said for cultural respect," the nation's most prominent gay political figure said in 2004. "Showing a bit of respect for cultural values with which you disagree is not a bad thing. Don't call people bigots and fools just because you disagree with them."

Thing is, Jacoby, Barney Frank is a very good politician and he knows when not to burn bridges. And I would not normally call someone a bigot or a fool just because I disagree with them either. I will, however, call them bigots and fools when they are being bigots and fools. And no matter how rational you attempt to make the bigoted position in this matter sound:

I believe that timeless moral standards must not be casually overturned and that doing so is apt to have unintended and unfortunate consequences. And I am sure that legalizing same-sex wedlock would fuel demands for further radical change - legalizing plural marriage, for example.

it is no less bigoted for all that. I read sentence one of that quote as "I'm scared that this will lead to the fall of my very small status quo comfort zone, therefore I will defend ridiculous standards created by religious leaders attempting to maintain their stranglehold over society many hundreds of years ago." I place sentence two in the same sort of hysteria fever dream as the famous "box turtle" remark - in other words, barefaced fearmongering. If that paragraph isn't bigotry, what is?

Jacoby, while I will be the first to admit there is wretched excess on all sides, in general, when the people on my side call the people on your side names, it is because the people on your side are being bigoted and/or evil. When the people on your side call the people on my side names, it is also, eighty percent of the time, because the people on your side are being bigoted and/or evil. (The other 20% of the time it's a fair cop. The left has plenty of stupidities of its own. Some days I wish a pox on both their houses.)

I'm not saying the left is not capable of evil; I'm saying that right now, the record is showing pretty clearly who is wearing the black hats most of the time. The portion of the right which has control of the microphone on our national stage right now is so actively evil that everyone who has any good in them whatsoever is deserting that group, and fleeing either to the uncomfortable arms of the left or to independent-limbo. The Republicans who are Republicans for sound reasons - the fiscal Republicans, the small-government Republicans, the lower-taxes Republicans - they don't fit anymore. The core has mutated into something very different, a black frothing engine of fear and hate and stupidity, and they have been stranded. If, as a member of the left, I failed to point this out at every opportunity, it wouldn't be a matter of civility - it would be a matter of me pretending something wasn't happening when it clearly was.

You're a smart man, Jacoby, and I don't think you are intrinsically evil. One of these days you're going to have to decide whether you want to embrace what remaining sanity is in you or whether you want to remain doctrinal at all costs. (If you choose the latter, be aware that the lunatics whose line you're valiantly hewing to will throw you to the wolves at the first opportunity. There is no loyalty in the bunker, and you think for yourself a little too often for their tastes.)

Meanwhile, I simply do not buy that anyone who takes a position against gay marriage does so for any reason other than bigotry. I will concede that it may be honest and/or unintentional bigotry. It may be bigotry motivated by fear and uncertainty instead of outright hate. It may be bigotry caused by people who try good-naturedly to do what their church tells them to do, without questioning the motivations of their church. But it's always bigotry, no matter what inspires it.

And bigotry deserves name-calling, especially when the name-calling is this clever. This isn't bitterness. This is telling it like it is.


<< older | © 2009 columbina | newer >>




Xeney:

I agree with you, 100 percent. (Does that ever happen?) When my crazy religious right wing aunt is on Facebook joining pro-gay marriage groups, then I am going to feel okay about calling people who want to mind other people's business bigots and homophobes.

But what is the box turtle remark?

-- 18:39, 12 November 2009 (GMT)


Nonelvis:

I have a policy of never reading Jeff Jacoby's columns, especially when he's foaming at the mouth about gay marriage. I see that, as usual, my policy remains sound.

-- 19:09, 12 November 2009 (GMT)


Patrick:

There is honestly no other reason to oppose gay marriage beyond bigotry. If you're opposing it on religious grounds, then you're intolerant of other religions. If you're opposing it on "moral" grounds, then you're against it based on nothing but discomfort at other peoples' identities.

It's so tiring to constantly bash one's head against a wall over an issue that quite literally doesn't affect the people who oppose it in any way whatsoever.

-- 19:13, 12 November 2009 (GMT)


Platypus:

On the box turtle remark:

http://www.boingboing.net/2004/07/18/gay-marriage-compare.html

-- 19:27, 12 November 2009 (GMT)


Columbina:

Xeney: It's a remark Senator John Cornyn of Texas theoretically made in 2004. Jon Stewart and others had a whole lot of fun with it. Theoretically, because it was apparently from the planned text of a speech and Cornyn never did actually deliver the line.

The inimitable Charles Pierce, writing for The American Prospect:

Anyway, in the prepared text of a speech he planned to deliver to the Heritage Foundation, Cornyn explained:

"It does not affect your daily life very much if your neighbor marries a box turtle. But that does not mean that it's right .... Now you must raise your children up in a world where that union of man and box turtle is on the same legal footing as man and wife."

Later, a spokesperson for Cornyn explained that Cornyn had not read the passage in his actual address. In other words, at the last minute, on an issue of mighty national import, Senator John Cornyn choked. Pure cowardice. Naked -- you should pardon the expression -- political expedience wins out again over principled leadership. Where is the outrage?

(OK, it's in Atlantic City, waiting by the slot machines for Bill Bennett to finish up, but you get the point.)

As a matter of fact, it matters a great deal to my daily life if my neighbor marries a box turtle. Granted, it doesn't matter as much as it did to my old college buddies who went out and got drunk one night and woke up married to snapping turtles. That didn't end well, although they both can hit the high notes in the national anthem now. However, having a neighbor who's married to a box turtle presents its own set of problems. For one thing, father-son softball games are pretty much impossible, if one of the dads takes several days to leg out a grounder to shortstop.


-- 19:28, 12 November 2009 (GMT)


Columbina:

P.S. I think my link is better than Platypus', but hers does show the really fabulous slide Stewart displayed on "The Daily Show," so don't miss that.

-- 19:30, 12 November 2009 (GMT)


Platypus:

Your link is much better; mine was of the quick and dirty 'did he ever really say that?' variety.

Jon Stewart's piece on it was awesome, though.

-- 19:50, 12 November 2009 (GMT)

Comment:

<< older | © 2009 columbina | newer >>

Personal tools
eccentric flower
fiction