Eccentric Flower:200909/A Tail of Bad Science

From Eccentric Flower

«September 2009 «Eccentric Flower

A Tail of Bad Science

This is a good entry. Or, more exactly, since the entry is really just a cue: It is a good set of comments.

Two short anecdotes, and then I will attempt to repeat the story of the Lamarckian puppies for Mrissa.

Anecdote the First: While putting Nonelvis to bed last night I told her about this thread and asked her the question posed in it. "Spontaneous generation," she immediately answered. Huzzah! I take this as a testament of the soundness of our marriage, and was inordinately gleeful.

Anecdote the Second: It took me years, YEARS, longer than I am willing to comfortably admit, to realize that the names of all them old scientific types had been Latinized. I still don't understand what misguided nationalistic or starched-collar impulse prompted people to do this. I'd have been a much happier camper if I had learned first about Carl von Linne and MikoĊ‚aj Kopernik - real people with real lives and real nationalities - rather than learning about these people with unreal names who seemed to have existed in some Science Never-Never Land.


And now, the tale of the Darwinian terrorists and the Lamarckian puppies.

This comes from my old, dusty copy of The Next Whole Earth Catalog, which I keep around even though almost all its sources and suppliers are obsolete, because it is such a wonderful hunk of layout and writing. You can open this enormous book to just about any page and find something good to read. As far as I'm concerned, that was the real genius of the Coevolution Quarterly folks - not only did they know a hell of a lot about a lot of things, but they tended to self-select for people who could actually write and/or tell a story well. I suspect they would have been a group of strident, humorless, easily dismissed hippies if not for this saving grace.

However, this story is not credited to one of them. It is credited to a man named Brian Donahue in Wayland, Massachusetts - and that's all I know. I present it as I found it (which includes a few edits I'm tempted to make but won't). I'm not going to lock this entry; Mr. Donahue or your heirs, if you ever find this, and want it to go away, let me know.

I have a friend - my boss, in fact - named McElwain, who is a Lamarckian. I was sitting by the stove with Bill and a visitor, when Bill's dog Penrod walked through the kitchen.

"How did your dog lose its tail?" the man asked. "Was it hit by a car, or what?"

"No," says Bill, "but her grandmother was."

"What?" says the man. "Are you trying to tell me this dog inherited the missing tail from its grandmother, who was hit by a car?"

"Something like that," said Bill. He leaned back and took a puff on his cigar. "Penrod's grandmother was hit by a car - right out here in front of the house - and we had to have her tail amputated. About a year later she had puppies -"

"- And they were all born without tails!"

"Just so. But, word about this got around, and on one night a roving band of militant Darwinians broke into the house, and grafted tails onto all the puppies."

"But you cut the tails back off, and so the acquired trait was passed on."

"Why would I do a thing like that?" asked McElwain. "I let the tails stay. It was no skin off my ass.

"At any rate, we gave all the puppies away except Penrod's mother. In due time she had puppies -"

"And they all had tails."

"Yes."

"So the Darwinists were satisfied - things were back to normal."

"The Darwinists were fit to be tied: They grafted the tail onto Penrod's mother. They knew that. Thus, Penrod and her brothers and sisters had inherited an acquired characteristic. They should have been born without tails, as their mother was born. Those Darwinists were in a bad situation."

"So what did they do?"

"What Darwinians always do: they broke in again, and cut off the puppies' tails."

"And that's why Penrod doesn't have a tail."

"That's why Penrod has no tail - Darwinian terrorists cut it off."

The visitor, an intelligent and well-rounded local physician, looked thoughtful for a while. Finally he asked, "Did Penrod have puppies?"

"She did," answered Bill, much pleased.

"Tail-less, I presume."

"Of course."

"But the Darwinists found out."

"They always do."

"So they broke in again and -"

"Yeah but this time," said Bill, "I was waiting for them. I mean I don't really care about the tails, but I was tired of having my house broken into. So this time I stayed up with a shotgun, loaded with rock salt. And when those damned Darwinians broke in here, boy, I just let them have it. I hit one, too - I heard her yelp."

"Her?"

"Yeah, a lot of those Darwinians are women. I think it appeals to their mothering instincts. Anyway, I haven't had any more trouble with Darwinians around here - not with the dogs, or with my frogs, either."

The doctor didn't even bother to ask about the frogs - there was an excited light in his eyes.

"You know Bill," he said, "I think I may know who one of those Darwinists was."

"Really?" said Bill, quite surprised.

"Yes," said the doctor. "I delivered a baby for a young woman the other day - quite a fine girl - one of your students, in fact."

"I'm not surprised," said Bill. "Which one?"

"I won't say," said the doctor. "But I think she may have been the gal you hit."

"You saw -"

"Yes: there I was, you know, delivering her baby girl, and damned if she didn't have a tail full of rock salt."

"She did? Which one?"

The doctor smiled. "Both of them."


<< older | © 2009 columbina | newer >>




Peebles:

Should you ever find this Latinized scientific Never-Never Land, I get dibs on "Publius".

(Publius Pan?)

-- 16:53, 3 September 2009 (BST)


Columbina:

I wouldn't have thought you to be a man of the public.

-- 17:46, 3 September 2009 (BST)


Platypus:

"It took me years, YEARS, longer than I am willing to comfortably admit, to realize that the names of all them old scientific types had been Latinized."

It... they... *flail*.

WHY DID NOBODY EVER TELL ME THIS BEFORE.

-- 18:20, 3 September 2009 (BST)


Joy:

I had no idea either. In fact, it took me a bit of time to figure out who Col was referring to up there. Sheesh. WTF?

-- 20:38, 3 September 2009 (BST)


ProfRobert:

Mikolaj, really, not Nikolaj? If so, that's not Latinization, that's changing Mike to Nick.

-- 23:00, 3 September 2009 (BST)


Danima:

I was sure it was someone in this thread who suggested Richard Garfinkle's Celestial Matters (for fun with spontaneous generation, epicycles, etc) -- it appears I was mistaken. I can't find the comment over in the linked thread, either.

If you are that person, oh, thank you. That was wonderfully entertaining.

-- 20:15, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Comment:

<< older | © 2009 columbina | newer >>

Personal tools
eccentric flower
fiction